C040 was filed in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Source ↗Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
3:24-cv-00846 · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Defendants
- Alex Ojeda
- Michaela Rutherford
- Enzo Rosati
- Jocelyn Robles
- John Richardson
- Matthew Ptashnik
- Heather Potter
- Chris Perkins
- Anna Papikian
- Matthew Rutledge
- Sabrina Navarro
- Aram Najarian
- Jason Mouttet
- Patrick Miller
- Anna Mdz
- Matthew McCawley
- Bre Macneil
- Ashley Starker
- Michael Yakubu
- Andrew Wong
- Makenzie S. White
- Kelly Weary
- Vik Vora
- Anthony Vela
- June Varn
- Toney Stutesman
- Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
- Michael Spatola
- Nadine Sokie
- Bizhan Shaban
- Jonathan Schey
- Johan Sanchez
- Ebenezer Sam
- Vanita Khan
- Kris Ackerman
- Nelly Anez
- Artem Avramov
- Miguel Baquero
- Connie Beam
- Allison Bertelson
- Adrian Bracamonte
- Mike Brislawn
- Yosef Brodsky
- Bradley Brown
- Charles Burkett
- Matthew Chandler
- Gareth Chin
- Lawrence Chun
- Gilbert Cimoli
- Osmar Cortez
- Faith Korkmaz
- Kusha Karvandi
- Thirumagal Kailashshankar
- Nicholas Jeter
- Cindy Jeffress
- Matthew James
- Dylan James
- Mohamad Hoteit
- Jovin Gray
- Aaron Goldenberg
- Regina Foley
- Mordechai Feinstein
- Joel Downs
- Aden Dannawi
- Pat Collico
- Erick Solares
Source record
This page separates court findings, party filings, research classifications and public statements. Unknown or unresolved fields remain labelled as such.
Outcome and research status
Outcome reason: A later M.D. Pa. opinion states the court had dismissed the same/identical claims in this action and that the prior dismissal was with prejudice.
Research status: Source-backed via later opinion
Research notes: The later C054 memorandum cites this case as Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators, 2024 WL 5318270 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 9, 2024), and describes the claims as identical and previously dismissed with prejudice.
Related litigation
- Dispute group: Shopify / business-platform conspiracy litigation
Chronology events
Sequence does not by itself prove motive or causation.
The earlier Shopify-related claims were dismissed with prejudice.
Source ↗Tufano filed a Lackawanna County complaint against Shopify and more than 100 other named defendants.
Source ↗The June 2025 state action was removed to the Middle District of Pennsylvania as C054.
Source ↗C054 was dismissed with prejudice and leave to amend was denied.
Source ↗Related YouTube research
- I think Shopify JUST ENDED MY BUSINESS
- Shopify OWNS YOU!!!
- Shopify is SCAMMING!
- Be careful of SHOPIFY!!! They are THIEVES!!!
- Shopify is EVIL and “Owns” your Store!!!
- 7 Years on Shopify FOR NOTHING!!!
- Accidentally Canceled Orders - SHOPIFY SUCKS
- One Click on Shopify will END YOUR BUSINESS
- Shopify Stupidity RUINED BUSINESS?!
- Shopify THIEVES