Source-linked public-record research into lawsuits, outcomes, repeated litigation, judicial findings, public statements and chronology of conduct.
55177/2021 · New York State Supreme Court
This page separates court findings, party filings, research classifications and public statements. Unknown or unresolved fields remain labelled as such.
Outcome reason: The court found no affidavit of service or other filing moving the case toward judgment, found no basis to extend the relevant deadlines, and noted that the LLC could not proceed pro se. The action was dismissed without prejudice and the motion to restore/stay arbitration was denied as moot.
Research status: Source-backed
Research notes: NYSCEF Case Status: Disposed. Plaintiffs originally filed through counsel; a September 23, 2022 consent-to-change-attorney filing allowed them to proceed pro se.
Court found no affidavit of service or other filing moving the action toward judgment, found no basis to extend deadlines, noted that the LLC could not proceed pro se, dismissed the action without prejudice, and denied the motion to restore/stay arbitration as moot.
Court source ↗Sequence does not by itself prove motive or causation.
Frankie's Free Range Meat LLC and others filed a New York Supreme Court action against Adam Starowicz.
Source ↗C089 was dismissed without prejudice after the court found no affidavit of service or other filing moving the action toward judgment; a request to restore/stay arbitration was denied as moot.
Source ↗Tufano filed C090 against Adam Starowicz in Westchester Supreme Court.
Source ↗Commentary from former counsel or other secondary sources is retained separately from court findings and primary-source records.
Davis recounts the Starowicz/Tufano business arbitration, reproduces language from an arbitrator stating that a preliminary hearing occurred Oct. 25, 2021 and that a request to pause/stay was addressed by email around Apr. 5, 2022, and reports that Starowicz filed a motion to dismiss C090 on Jan. 9, 2023. The article later notes the state case was settled and claims voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.
Evidentiary treatment: Use for leads, chronology and quoted arbitration context only. Davis's characterizations (for example that arguments were meritless or that Tufano tried to circumvent arbitration) are not court findings unless independently corroborated.
Secondary source ↗