Frank Tufano lawsuits involving Sarah Thompson
2 originating actions · 2 docket records
Cases involving Sarah Thompson
Sarah Thompson is named in 2 de-duplicated originating actions in this dataset (2 docket records) across 2 courts filed between January 11, 2023 and February 1, 2023. 2 of the docket records carry a recorded outcome.
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 1, 2023 | 50058/2023Frank Tufano v. American Arbitration Association et al | New York State Supreme Court | Discontinued |
| January 11, 2023 | 7:23-cv-00244Tufano v. American Arbitration Association et al | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York | Dismissed |
Judges who have ruled in these cases
Listing a judge records who decided a motion or entered an order in a case naming this party. It is not an evaluation of the judge.
Court & ruling records in these cases
Recorded only where tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
After issuing an order to show cause and receiving Tufano's response, the court dismissed the action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, without prejudice to an appropriate state-court action.
What the filings allege
- 50058/2023Plaintiff Frank Tufano, pro se, sued the American Arbitration Association, arbitrator Sarah Thompson, opposing party Adam Starowicz, and attorney Jeffrey K.
- 7:23-cv-00244Frank Tufano, pro se, filed a complaint (and, the next day, an amended complaint) before Judge Vincent L.
These summarise the plaintiff's own allegations as pleaded. They are party filings, not court findings, and no court has adopted them by recording them here. Each links to the full summary on the case page.
Named alongside
Other tracked parties named in the same originating actions.
Related dispute groups
- Starowicz / arbitration / Davis litigationSix docket records from the Frankie's Free Range Meat arbitration dispute, naming Adam Starowicz, the American Arbitration Association and Jeffrey Davis.
This index groups name variants conservatively using the workbook's alias mapping. A repeated defendant does not by itself show that claims were duplicative or meritless.