The Taban malpractice action was transferred from M.D. Pa. and opened in the Central District of California as 2:25-cv-00147.
Taban / eye-surgery-related litigation
Analytical grouping for the Taban medical/surgery dispute across the original federal case, California Superior Court matters, Pennsylvania federal/state filings, and closely related medical-board / ophthalmology defendants. Grouping does not itself mean every claim is legally identical.
Cases in this group
- 3:25-cv-00011 — Tufano v. Taban et al
- 25SMCV00041 — Frank Tufano v. Mehryar Ray Taban, MD et al.
- 3:25-cv-01175 — Tufano v. TikTok et al
- 25SMCV05503 — Frank Tufano v. Mehryar Ray Taban, MD et al.
- 2026-01161 — Tufano v. The State of California
- 3:26-cv-00447 — Tufano v. The State of California et al
- 3:26-cv-00840 — Tufano v. The State of California et al
- 3:26-cv-01016 — Tufano v. Eriksson et al
Dated chronology
Tufano filed C063 in M.D. Pa. against the State of California, Taban and related defendants.
A Lackawanna County complaint underlying C035/C066 was dated the same day as C063.
The Lackawanna action was removed to M.D. Pa. as C066.
Both C063 and C066 dockets reflect April 8 show-cause orders concerning improper venue and possible transfer/dismissal.
Tufano filed a request asking whether the removed action would return to state court because there were 'two identical Federal matters' causing confusion.
A public post/video stated that Taban's lawyer was arguing Tufano was medically fit for trial and framed the issue as forcing a sick patient to attend trial.
Tufano filed a statement of his current physical health in the C.D. California action.
Tufano filed California Superior Court case 25SMCV00041 concerning the Taban medical/surgery dispute.
The American Academy of Ophthalmology obtained a demurrer ruling without leave to amend in 25SMCV00041.
The state court granted ASOPRS's motion to quash for lack of personal jurisdiction and sustained the Medical Board's demurrer without leave to amend.
An indexed California minute order concerns an Order to Show Cause re sanctions on Plaintiff for failure to submit a case-management statement; the snippet states there was no appearance by or for Plaintiff.
A second California Superior Court Taban case, 25SMCV05503, was filed.
The M.D. Pa. court issued show-cause orders addressing improper venue in the parallel Taban-related federal matters.
The court granted ASOPRS's motion to quash service for lack of personal jurisdiction in C102.
ASOPRS argued within its motion-to-quash proceeding that Tufano had become a vexatious litigant; the court stated the request was beyond the scope of that motion and would require a separate motion.
The Medical Board of California filed a motion to dismiss C063 for failure to state a claim, together with a request for judicial notice.
Dispute groups are research/navigation categories. They are not judicial findings that every case contains legally identical claims.