Frank Tufano case records naming Joseph F. Saporito Jr.
3 originating actions · 4 indexed records
Cases in this index naming Joseph F. Saporito Jr.
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 6, 2026 | 3:26-cv-00879Tufano v. Tyler Technologies, Inc. et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Order adopted R&R (2026-06-25, non-final); Tufano appealed the denial of emergency injunctive relief and a stay |
| July 8, 2024 | 3:24-cv-01115Tufano v. Fenix Internet, LLC | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
| July 8, 2024 | 3:24-cv-01114Tufano v. Reddit, Inc. | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.
Parties named in these cases
Related dispute groups
Court & ruling records
Records naming Joseph F. Saporito Jr., tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Joseph F. Saporito Jr.; it is not an evaluation of the judge.
Failure to state a claim; appeal deemed frivolous
Order dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a claim without further leave to amend and deemed any appeal frivolous and not taken in good faith.
November 13, 2024 ruling source — casemine.com ↗Appeal expressly deemed frivolous; amendment futile
Final order dismissed the action and expressly deemed any appeal frivolous and not taken in good faith; no further leave to amend was granted because amendment would be futile.
December 11, 2024 ruling source — casemine.com ↗Appeal certified not taken in good faith; IFP on appeal denied
Ruling on Tufano's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis from the dismissal of this action, the district court 'CERTIFIES that the plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith' and denied the motion. A second in forma pauperis motion followed on 2025-03-18, and the Third Circuit ultimately dismissed the appeal on 2025-07-23 for failure to prosecute, the fee never having been paid. Recorded from the district docket entry's own text (entry 19); the order itself was not read.
January 3, 2025 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗R&R adopted; preliminary-injunction motion denied
Order (Doc. 13) adopting the April 9, 2026 report and recommendation. The court found Tufano's objections (Doc. 7) "to be unpersuasive and without merit," adopted the report, denied the pro se emergency motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 2), and remanded the matter to the magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.
June 25, 2026 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.