Judge / court record index

Frank Tufano case records naming Philip M. Halpern

1 originating action · 2 indexed records

Originating actions1
Court & ruling records1
NY status records1

Cases in this index naming Philip M. Halpern

FiledCaseCourtStatus / outcome
July 2, 202566298/2025Frank Tufano v. Social Security Administration et alNew York State Supreme CourtRemoved to federal court

A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.

Court & ruling records

Records naming Philip M. Halpern, tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.

All 73 records →

Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Philip M. Halpern; it is not an evaluation of the judge.

Combined Rule 12(b)(1) / Rule 56 motion denied without prejudice (procedural)
Non-final court orderJune 17, 2026

Denied the Social Security Administration's motion for summary judgment without prejudice, for failure to comply with the Court's Individual Practices; a related motion for an extension was denied as moot the same day. Correction 2026-08-25: the moving papers, read in full, show this was not a motion for summary judgment alone. The Social Security Administration moved "for dismissal of the above-captioned complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 56." The denial was purely procedural -- "Motion denied without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court's Individual Practices" -- because the government's papers were not completely filed until 12:05 a.m. The motion was re-filed Aug. 19-20, 2026.

June 17, 2026 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗

New York state case status records

These are procedural docket status entries (e.g. discontinuance, dismissal basis) — not court findings.

CaseCountyOutcomeFinal disposition
66298/2025WestchesterRemoved to federal courtState docket disposed by removal; federal action ongoing

Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.