Frank Tufano case records naming Robert D. Mariani
4 originating actions · 5 indexed records
Cases in this index naming Robert D. Mariani
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 22, 2025 | 3:25-cv-01574Tufano v. Google LLC et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Transferred to N.D. Cal.; renewed motion to dismiss granted with leave to amend; case terminated Aug. 19, 2026 |
| July 29, 2025 | 3:25-cv-01400Tufano v. Saladino, MD et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
| June 27, 2025 | 3:25-cv-01175Tufano v. TikTok et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
| June 2, 2025 | 3:25-cv-00975Tufano v. SHOPIFY (USA) Inc. Corporation Service Company et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.
Parties named in these cases
Aaron GoldenbergAaron OceanAden DannawiAdrian BracamonteAidan BothaAlex N OjedaAllen HeydariAllison BertelsonAlphabet IncAndrew WongAngela VosgerichianAnna FilatovaAnna MdzAnna PapikianAnthony VelaAram NajarianAriana IrelandArtem AvramovAshley StarkerBetsy GutierrezBilly RayBizhan ShabanBradley BrownBrandon Mele
Showing 24 of 149 tracked parties; the rest are listed on the individual case pages.
Related dispute groups
Court & ruling records
Records naming Robert D. Mariani, tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Robert D. Mariani; it is not an evaluation of the judge.
Rule 41(b) dismissal
Final order adopted the R&R, dismissed the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and directed the Clerk to close the case.
September 4, 2025 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Personal jurisdiction / service / transfer
Order transferred the remaining case to the Northern District of California; Taban defendants had been dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction and RealSelf dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve.
December 15, 2025 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Partial dismissal: Taban defendants dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction
Order adopting the report and recommendation and dismissing only the Taban defendants, for lack of personal jurisdiction. The action continued against TikTok and the matter was remanded to the chief magistrate judge for further proceedings. This partial disposition precedes, and is distinct from, the June 30, 2026 dismissal already recorded for this case.
December 17, 2025 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Dismissal with prejudice
Court adopted the R&R and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The short final order does not reproduce the complete reasoning from the R&R.
March 20, 2026 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Failure to effect proper service
Court adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to effect proper service; the Clerk was directed to close the case.
June 30, 2026 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.