Frank Tufano case records naming Dolly M. Gee
1 originating action · 1 indexed record
Cases in this index naming Dolly M. Gee
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 16, 2026 | 2:26-cv-09565Frank Tufano v. Kjar McKenna and Stockalper LLP et al | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | Dismissed without prejudice on the court's own order; case terminated |
A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.
Parties named in these cases
Related dispute groups
Court & ruling records
Records naming Dolly M. Gee, tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Dolly M. Gee; it is not an evaluation of the judge.
Dismissal for uncorrected filing deficiency
On the court's standard form IFP-10, 'Order of Dismissal or Remand', the court ordered that 'this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED without prejudice', terminated the case and marked it JS-6. The form issues where the court has sent a warning letter about a filing deficiency and more than thirty days have passed without correction. Which of the form's three alternative deficiencies was marked cannot be determined: the filed copy is flattened and carries no tick glyph in any content stream. The docket shows that the complaint was entered Sept. 8, 2026 alongside a notice of deficiency in filed documents and a notice of discrepancies with the filing of a complaint.
October 22, 2026 ruling source — storage.courtlistener.com ↗Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.