Frank Tufano case records naming Karoline Mehalchick
3 originating actions · 3 indexed records
Cases in this index naming Karoline Mehalchick
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 7, 2025 | 3:25-cv-01227Tufano v. SHOPIFY (USA) Inc. Corporation Service Company et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
| July 26, 2024 | 3:24-cv-01252Tufano v. Filatova | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
| July 8, 2024 | 3:24-cv-01117Tufano v. Miller et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Dismissed |
A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.
Parties named in these cases
Aaron GoldenbergAaron OceanAden DannawiAdrian BracamonteAidan BothaAlex N OjedaAllen HeydariAllison BertelsonAmos MillerAndrew WongAngela VosgerichianAnna FilatovaAnna MdzAnna PapikianAnthony VelaAram NajarianAriana IrelandArtem AvramovAshley StarkerBetsy GutierrezBilly RayBizhan ShabanBradley BrownBrandon Mele
Showing 24 of 148 tracked parties; the rest are listed on the individual case pages.
Related dispute groups
Court & ruling records
Records naming Karoline Mehalchick, tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Karoline Mehalchick; it is not an evaluation of the judge.
Final adoption of meritless/frivolous R&R; dismissal with prejudice
District court adopted Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R in its entirety and dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice. The adopted R&R had described the case as legally infirm, without merit, involving frivolous claims and jurisdictional manipulation. Update 2026-08-25: the order itself, read in full, dismisses the amended complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to comply with the court's Aug. 28, 2024 orders.
December 16, 2024 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗Prior warning followed by noncompliance
Court dismissed the action without prejudice after a prior order warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal and Tufano then failed over several months to address the issues surrounding his IFP averments.
February 11, 2025 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Res judicata / repetitive identical claims
Court held that Tufano raised claims identical to those previously dismissed in C040 and that the claims were barred by res judicata, collateral estoppel and issue preclusion; complaint dismissed with prejudice and leave to amend denied as futile. Update 2026-08-25: the memorandum and order, read in full, also record that leave to amend was denied as futile, that 18 U.S.C. sec. 241 affords no civil cause of action, and that a forum-selection clause designating Ontario applied.
February 25, 2026 ruling source — govinfo.gov ↗Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.