Frank Tufano lawsuits involving Vegan Gains
2 originating actions · 2 docket records
Cases involving Vegan Gains
Vegan Gains is named in 2 de-duplicated originating actions in this dataset (2 docket records) in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania filed between February 17, 2026 and October 6, 2026. 1 of the docket records carry a recorded outcome.
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| October 6, 2026 | 3:26-cv-02977Tufano v. Google LLC | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Pending; complaint filed Oct. 6, 2026 against Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Richard Burgess and Vegan Gains, and assigned to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Caraballo. An emergency request for a writ of seizure and an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order were filed the same day, and a notice filed by the plaintiff records that emergency status was denied by verbal order. An application to proceed in forma pauperis is undecided and no defendant has responded. |
| February 17, 2026 | 3:26-cv-00397Tufano v. Burgess | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Default-judgment motion denied without prejudice (non-final) |
Judges who have ruled in these cases
Listing a judge records who decided a motion or entered an order in a case naming this party. It is not an evaluation of the judge.
Court & ruling records in these cases
Recorded only where tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Default-judgment motion denied without prejudice
After previously ordering Tufano to provide Rule 4 proof of service, the court denied his motion for default judgment without prejudice.
What the filings allege
- 3:26-cv-00397Plaintiff Frank Tufano, pro se, alleges defamation of character (42 Pa.
These summarise the plaintiff's own allegations as pleaded. They are party filings, not court findings, and no court has adopted them by recording them here. Each links to the full summary on the case page.
Named alongside
Other tracked parties named in the same originating actions.
This index groups name variants conservatively using the workbook's alias mapping. A repeated defendant does not by itself show that claims were duplicative or meritless.