Frank Tufano case records naming Phillip J. Caraballo
3 originating actions · 3 indexed records
Cases in this index naming Phillip J. Caraballo
| Filed | Case | Court | Status / outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 2, 2026 | 3:26-cv-00840Tufano v. The State of California et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Venue show-cause order; dismissal motions pending (non-final) |
| February 23, 2026 | 3:26-cv-00447Tufano v. The State of California et al | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Venue show-cause order; dismissal motions pending (non-final) |
| February 17, 2026 | 3:26-cv-00397Tufano v. Burgess | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania | Default-judgment motion denied without prejudice (non-final) |
A case appears here because a tracked record names this judge. The listing is not an evaluation of the judge or of any ruling.
Parties named in these cases
American Academy of OphthalmologyAmerican Board of Cosmetic SurgeryAmerican Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBeverly Hills Masonic LodgeKjar McKenna & Stockalper LLPLavely & Singer PCMehryar Ray Taban MDMehryar Taban MD IncThe Medical Board of CaliforniaThe State of California
Related dispute groups
Court & ruling records
Records naming Phillip J. Caraballo, tied to an order, opinion or report and recommendation.
Record labels distinguish final orders/opinions, reports and recommendations, non-final orders, and tentative/indexed ruling records. This lists records naming Phillip J. Caraballo; it is not an evaluation of the judge.
Improper-venue show-cause order
The court ordered Tufano to show cause by Apr. 30 why the action should not be transferred or dismissed for improper venue under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a), warning that failure to show good cause could result in transfer or dismissal.
April 8, 2026 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗Improper-venue / response show-cause order
The court ordered Tufano to show cause why the action should not be transferred or dismissed for improper venue and directed him to respond to ASOPRS's dismissal motion; the docket also warned of consequences for failure to brief/respond.
April 8, 2026 ruling source — docketbird.com ↗Default-judgment motion denied without prejudice
After previously ordering Tufano to provide Rule 4 proof of service, the court denied his motion for default judgment without prejudice.
May 21, 2026 ruling source — courtlistener.com ↗Judge names are grouped conservatively using the workbook's judge-alias mapping. This page indexes public records naming this judge; it is not a judicial performance evaluation.