Federal citations re-sourced onto openable records (August 28, 2026)
Federal citations re-sourced onto records a reader can open. Every one of the 49 federal cases cited a PacerMonitor docket page as its primary source, and PacerMonitor, DocketBird, Justia and Trellis all now serve a bot block or CAPTCHA rather than the record. 187 source URLs across seven tables were replaced with CourtListener docket pages, per-entry CourtListener anchors, and GovInfo opinion PDFs. No finding, date, holding or status was changed by this pass and no case's Last researched date was advanced: it substitutes an openable citation for an inaccessible one pointing at the same record. Where the old citation named a specific document, the replacement names that same document wherever a free copy exists (10 published opinions came from GovInfo, 73 rows now point at the exact docket entry). Four rows were deliberately left on their existing URLs: three cite the April 8, 2026 improper-venue show-cause order in 3:26-cv-00840, which is indexed by DocketBird but is not mirrored on CourtListener, RECAP, the Internet Archive or GovInfo, and one cites a California Superior Court record for which a federal docket is not a substitute.
Related cases
- 3:23-cv-02106 — Tufano v. Levy et al
- 3:24-cv-00846 — Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
- 3:24-cv-01117 — Tufano v. Miller et al
- 3:24-cv-01115 — Tufano v. Fenix Internet, LLC
- 3:24-cv-01116 — Tufano v. TikTok Inc.
- 3:24-cv-01114 — Tufano v. Reddit, Inc.
- 3:24-cv-01252 — Tufano v. Filatova
- 3:25-cv-00011 — Tufano v. Taban et al
- 3:25-cv-00316 — Tufano v. Shopify (USA) Inc. et al
- 3:25-cv-00262 — Tufano v. Saladino et al
- 3:25-cv-00260 — Tufano v. USDA et al
- 3:25-cv-00975 — Tufano v. SHOPIFY (USA) Inc. Corporation Service Company et al
- 3:25-cv-00976 — Tufano v. Fenix Internet LLC
- 3:25-cv-01165 — Tufano v. Fenix Internet LLC
- 3:25-cv-01175 — Tufano v. TikTok et al
- 3:25-cv-01227 — Tufano v. SHOPIFY (USA) Inc. Corporation Service Company et al
- 3:25-cv-01400 — Tufano v. Saladino, MD et al
- 3:25-cv-01495 — Tufano v. Reddit, Inc.
- 3:25-cv-01558 — Tufano v. All-Ways Forwarding et al
- 3:25-cv-01574 — Tufano v. Google LLC et al
- 4:25-cv-01960 — Tufano v. Saladino, MD et al
- 3:25-cv-01990 — Tufano v. USDA et al
- 3:26-cv-00396 — Tufano v. Saladino, MD et al
- 3:26-cv-00397 — Tufano v. Burgess
- 3:26-cv-00447 — Tufano v. The State of California et al
- 3:26-cv-00542 — Tufano v. Nelson et al
- 3:26-cv-00835 — Tufano v. Based Bodyworks, LLC et al
- 3:26-cv-00840 — Tufano v. The State of California et al
- 3:26-cv-00879 — Tufano v. Tyler Technologies, Inc. et al
- 3:26-cv-00939 — Tufano v. Better Life Foods Inc. et al
- 3:26-cv-01020 — Tufano v. Mighty Meats LLC et al
- 3:26-cv-01021 — Tufano v. Ice Cream for Bears LLC et al
- 3:26-cv-01016 — Tufano v. Eriksson et al
- 3:26-cv-01019 — Tufano v. Shopify (USA) Inc. et al
- 3:26-cv-01018 — Tufano v. United States Department of Agriculture
- 3:26-cv-01266 — Tufano v. Saladino, MD et al
- 3:26-cv-01312 — Tufano v. Small Business Administration et al
- 3:26-cv-01667 — Tufano v. National Fire & Marine Insurance et al
- 3:26-cv-02135 — Tufano v. Crispino et al
- 3:26-cv-02136 — Tufano v. United Healthcare
- 3:26-cv-02133 — Tufano v. Hiraeth et al
- 3:26-cv-02132 — Tufano v. BBB
- 3:26-cv-02134 — Tufano v. Miller et al
- 3:26-cv-02138 — Tufano v. Experian et al
- 3:26-cv-02137 — Tufano v. Carbondale Police Department et al
- 3:26-cv-02238 — Tufano v. Meagher Insurance Agency et al
- 3:26-cv-02257 — Tufano v. Free and Accepted Masons of Union Lodge No. 291 et al
- 7:23-cv-00244 — Tufano v. American Arbitration Association et al
- 7:20-cv-09346 — Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano
Note
Citations are recorded so that a reader can open the underlying record. Replacing a citation does not change the evidence layer it sits in: a docket page is recorded as a docket source, a court order as a court record, and neither is upgraded to a stronger finding by being easier to reach. Where no freely accessible copy of a cited document could be located, the original citation was left in place rather than substituting a broader link that does not show the cited fact.